The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe

In "The Trial of Karen Read," listeners are drawn into a gripping courtroom drama unfolding around the mysterious death of John O'Keefe. This investigative series explores the intricate details of the trial of Karen Read, the woman accused of a crime that has captivated the nation. Each episode delves into the evidence presented, the witnesses' testimonies, and the legal strategies from both the defense and the prosecution. As the trial progresses, the podcast also examines the broader implications of the case, including its impact on the local community, the justice system, and the media. With expert commentary from legal analysts, interviews with key figures close to the case, and a deep dive into the social and psychological dimensions involved, this series seeks to uncover the truth behind the headlines and answer the question: Is there justice for John O'Keefe? Join us as we piece together the story, challenge preconceptions, and follow every twist and turn in this compelling search for justice.

Recent Episodes

Episodes loading...

Recent Reviews

Ringer678

12 Conflictling Claims

The information is good, but good Lord, that whistling “s” was horrendous on my ears. I turned the volume down and still could not stand the squeaking. I had to turn it off.
Cmm113

Unbiased?

Look up the definition of that please, because this ain’t it. Also could do without the hosts recorded coughing. Talk about lack of professionalism.
AndrewRicardo

Fun show, host is kind of a jerk

Desperate for the content but the host does have a clear disgust for Karen Read so I’m not confident I’m getting clear information. He can’t help but characterize Karen Read. Keeps saying he’s not a psychologist but consistently calls her a narcissist and she can’t take accountability. Very little discussion of the facts. This guys just bashes Karen Read. It’s wild. He really can’t help himself.
Vesiculartuna

This is a Joke

This is so poorly done and is totally biased in favor of the commonwealth. First, the two do not know simple aspects of Law and Order. They do not understand the defense’s job. They also do not understand the relationship between John and the people in the house. They were NOT friends. They knew each other. There is a difference.
Alexchains

Nonstop ads!

5 minutes of adds to end a 15 minute episode?!
Reasonableplayersolidadvice

Good job

Refreshing to hear coverage from someone not caught up in the mob mentality that Turtleboy and Read purposely created around this case.
alexrob22

Biased and misogynistic

Was looking for an informative take. Sadly SO biased. The male host compares his “narcissistic” ex gfs and wife to Karen 😬
Lissasj

Blatantly biased

The investigation was a sham, with reasonable doubt at every turn. Can’t believe this is being pushed as a recommendation
Bxxtr11

Can’t even listen to it anymore

This podcast has gotten so bad. The host is so biased and whiny… he can’t even pretend he doesn’t hate Karen Read. It’s gotten unbearable to listen to. Do not recommend. 0 stars if I could.
KAZ7885

Poor audio quality & reporting

This is maddeningly difficult to listen to- if not for the poor quality of sound, for the mental gymnastics the presenters do to paint legal cases in a manner favorable to the prosecution- which, if you know this case- is no small feat 😂
Meesh725

FKR

She’s innocent. No question. The police are corrupt
jalo h

Proctor

First off in order to get tiny pieces of tail light. Take a piece of tail light and a hammer. Beat the pieces of tail light into the shirt. Didn’t the first officer actually wrote that John was in a fight? What about the inverted video that they tried to pass off as acurate? Is that ok? .
GreenIsDenise

Biased Looney Tunes

Waste of your time. The hosts of the actual podcast part are complete looney tunes and using the trial audio to boost their listener audience. Disgustingly biased, look no further than the episode titles.
notaperfectmommy

Biased and rude

Don’t bother listening to this unless you want to hear a complete misrepresentation of the facts. Host brings on guests and sets them up with leading questions, and the. they prop up his mistruths. Co-host has never had an original thought.
Meganeesium

One Sided & Hard to Listen To

For some reason he needs to pronounce Karen’s name incorrectly as thought it’s an intentional slight. She isn’t listening, I’m sure. The bias is so egregious, it’s hard to listen to. Some facts, but a lot of one person’s opinion.
giga chad ukraine

What did I just listen to? Biased 1000

Wow, I was hopeful for a Karen podcast. The bias is thick.
kristi821

don’t waste your time

i listened to a lot of episodes because i wanted to hear the trial, bits that i missed. the trial episodes at some point started skipping and were often impossible to listen to. the commentary episodes are often incredibly biased. tony’s hate for turtleboy clouds his judgement. he also doesn’t get his facts straight. he’s too busy hating on karen and everything related to her. really disappointed in this podcast. if you want an unbiased version of this case, listen to the 13th Juror podcast.
Rhody19

Completely biased

Super super biased. This guy sounds like an idiot half the time. Two stars simply because some of the actual court info is good but the conclusion this guy draws from certain things is wild.
BoWcephusD

Had to unfollow

The bias was so clear. Rather than just letting the story tell itself it reels you in then trash talks.
Leogrlz

Clearly a one sided opinion

This is clearly biased. There is no 2 sided angle to this podcast which just lacks intelligence. Clearly on the side of corruption and hates KR. Shameful, since you don’t know her personally. I prefer to hear both sides when digging into this story. It helps to see more clearly things just don’t add up. But if you are like this podcaster, you may think she’s guilty too. There’s a plethora of reasonable doubt, but you won’t hear it on this podcast!
ryannlynn

So bias

Too many ads and very little content or fact checking. So bad and very bias. The audacity to seek out premium members to pay is laughable and offensive. Definitely not worth it. Wouldn’t recommend.
Composition Books

Sick cash grab.

Poorly put-together with nothing but biased guests and a complete moron of a host. With all the commercials, it’s clear that this is just a cash grab over other folks’ tragedy.
A. FUNT

Blah blah blah

I need justice for my ears.
mary sio

Wow biased against Karen Read

1st time listening - Karen is fighting for her life and all you’ve done is attack her. Not a good crime podcast - so biased and victim shaming. Won’t listen again. You’re as bad as turtle boy.
CheckFacts

No FactChecking

Poor editing …. Please remove nasal issues , it’s distracting and unprofessional. Further, there’s not unbiased facts disclosed in proper contexts …annoying ads. Skip this one.
Ehenrie

Clearly Biased

Clearly biased against Karen Read, but there is some good info included and discussed. Much rather have an unbiased, untainted podcast. The Court Audio is great, the 20 min episode with 8 minutes of ads is not great
BRITBURESKI

Sponcon

This is not a podcast it’s literally 95% ads. So bizarre not sure how this is even allowed to be posted as actual content.
JDUR9232

Say His Name - KIRK MINIHANE

I notice there was no credit given in your most recent podcast that covered Sandra Birchmore, that it was Barstool’s “The Case” Podcast presented by Kirk Minihane that was the reason that case was re-opened.
hi trashie mom

Commercials and biased

Get your facts straight!!! It was Karen Read supporters that had their lawns bleached!
Tbleprox

Stop with the editing!

Leave the court testimony as is. This editing and speeding the testimony up makes it impossible to listen to. Why did you start doing this??? To save money?? It doesn’t make sense. If I want to skip ahead I can do that. You never did this on any previous trials.
Mynameisberies

This show is silly (ALL Advertisements)

Episodes are just the same clips over and over again. Some episodes are 27 minutes and 22+ minutes are ads. Now he’s spouting nonsense about an altered photo depicting a client and attorney together romantically and speculating about their characters and how this could impact the future. Stop spreading unsubstantiated lies and AI photos. Gross.
tj0426!

Don’t waste your time

Garbage
ammorse7

Ugh

Awful. Where did you get the photo on your thumbnail, Michael Proctor? Jennifer Cofindaffer? She is proven to work for the prosecution. Ridiculous
bree3177

Not very factual

If you love cops and throw out all facts and evidence out the window then I guess this is the podcast for you. If you want to hear about actual facts and evidence this is not the one to listen to.
KAYBE8

Zzzzzz

Nothing to see here
Lizzie hizzie

This isn’t a podcast

.
JimC2019

Commercials with a bit of content

Like a car accident that you can’t look at. 90% commercials. Has the host ever watched court tv. Mis states facts and also completely butchered the phrase “voir dire.”
Blondie________1980

Ugh

Tony sounds like a disgusting human. Awful!
kayinLA84

Sexist and biased host

The host is a disgusting person. He literally said Karen’s hot but the fact that she doesn’t want children is a major turn off. Yuck. Also, he’s super super biased against Karen.
Game Hil

Thank you

You were much better today at listening to your guests. Less biased.
Brittskeey

These two are the least interesting people to listen to

Listening to this is like being in a really awkward conversation and praying it ends soon
Joan Gold

Terrible

Terrible host and the ads are 90% of the podcast. Ridiculous!
Boston Nay Nay

Host hasn’t taken a moment to understand the evidence

The host is very biased but doesn’t tell us why he believes Karen is guilty. There are a solid 7 min of ads at the end of the most recent episode I listened to, after they said they’d be right back with more Karen Read trial. That’s literally how the episode ended. I was hoping to hear a different and intelligent take on this case but I just wasted 45 minutes of my life on this podcast in which the host seems to not even understand the most critical evidence presented, yet he airs it on his own show.
crxpat

Biased and Full of Advertisements

Can’t believe this host is listening to the same testimony as the rest of us. So far the defense is clearly punching holes in the investigation and credibility of the witnesses. However, the host can’t wait to sum up everything as clear cut guilty of KR. Also the ads are on a loop and they make up 80% of the episodes. Yuck!
Oliviaxoxlol

Nah

Commercial on commercial and like maybe I’m biased I just don’t like their opinions
Pya3g

1% content 99% ads

Unlistenable
617MS

Pure Garbage

Biased and not factually based
astrid 857

Stop speeding up day 23!

I would give this podcast 10 stars until day 23 when the testimony got sped up and I can’t even hear the questions. Please go back to the original format.
merrrycherry12

All commercials

This podcast should be called a commercialcast because that’s all it is. Don’t waste your time.
bbdill000

Lazy

They are not following the case closely and are googling while podcasting to topics that have been playing out in the courtroom.